Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Taipei Economic and Cultural Office in Guam

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect‎ to Taiwan–United States relations#Consular representation. (non-admin closure) Alpha3031 (t • c) 08:48, 6 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Taipei Economic and Cultural Office in Guam

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non notable consulate. Mccapra (talk) 07:55, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Taiwan and Oceania. Mccapra (talk) 07:55, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bilateral relations-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 08:04, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Diplomatic representation on this level rarely meets WP:ORGCRIT, can't find anything to indicate this case is different. AusLondonder (talk) 12:14, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete all the sources are primary except 6 and 7. For this source, it's a small mention of the office so doesn't meet WP:SIGCOV. Fails WP:ORG. LibStar (talk) 01:37, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Taiwan–United States relations#Consular representation. —Kusma (talk) 10:40, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Taiwan–United States relations#Consular representation (with the history preserved under the redirect), where the subject is already mentioned, per Wikipedia:Deletion policy#Alternatives to deletion.
A redirect with the history preserved under the redirect will allow editors to selectively merge any content that can be reliably sourced to the target article. A redirect with the history preserved under the redirect will allow the redirect to be undone if significant coverage in reliable sources is found in the future. Cunard (talk) 10:44, 1 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment no objection to a redirect as nominator. Mccapra (talk) 21:35, 1 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. There is no significant coverage that discusses the topic in detail. 181.197.42.215 (talk) 18:32, 3 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.